Dance in/and Space
Submitted by: Neha Tickoo (this piece was previously published in November 2014 newsletter at Bibahan, an experimental theatre group based in Kolkata, India)
“Sunil Shanbag : So if you were to put it in concrete terms,
when you enter a space, what would you look at?
Astad Deboo : Challenge.”[1]
The word “challenge” and it's utterance by a dancer. That is all that intrigues me to enough, for the moment, to be carried on to shreds. This word sums up all of the essence and purpose of the
creative enquiry that an artist like Deboo undertakes, in relation to the space
that he inhabits and moves in. He begins
with so much curiosity and speculation that eventually in the gradual process
of movements, his presence and the space become inseparable, or one can say
that the space feeds into his presence. Similarly, the understanding of
performance in unconventional spaces of public interaction and spectatorship
has had intrigued me for some time, given my own practice as a dancer-performer
engaged in fresh perspectives. It unsettled me that almost always classical
dance had to be subject to and depend on the availability of the illusory
auditorium stage, which then involves an industry of it’s own, with respect to
lights, sound, marketing etc. Evoking space with and for dance then becomes one
aspect which challenges the dancer in me and provokes me to challenge it back.
I take the cue of “challenge” from this understanding further to, first of all,
discuss how space in performance history, both theatre and in dance has been
invigorated and then how I propose to challenge space, through the platform of
this dissertation and practice.
In the field of dance, there have been productions and
explorations that have left indelible impressions by taking forward the notion
of challenging not only the physical body but the space of performance as well[2]. In fact, Valerie A.
Briginshaw’s book Dance, Space and
Subjectivity[3],
tells us that there seems to be an explosion of dance related spatial
explorations in recent times yet maintains her lament that investigations about
space through the medium of dance have hardly been undertaken for theoretical
analysis.(Introduction, p5) Many of the dancers have worked and re-worked on
innovating the content and the form as advanced performances but the modes and
styles of performance presentation seem to remain stuck to the proscenium,
majorly. The politics of proscenium has been well debated and discussed. One of
the few people who have tried to venture beyond the closed notions of dance
performance spaces is Astad Deboo[4].
The hint is also towards the ways
dance-movement arts as a whole have been perceived and projected. True, there
have been dance practitioners and theorists working methodically to measure the
tides in dance and movement art trajectories across the globe. There have also
been practices, internationally breaking the notion of public and conventional
art spaces through the medium of dance and creative movement. Take for example
the work done by The Movement Party[5],
a group based in Poland ;
or the works based on Indian classical dance by a South Asian group called ‘Akademi’[6]
based in the United Kingdom .
But although there have been researches conducted like about for example: One
of the significant pioneers in this regard is the Post-Natyam Collective[7],
which uses the cyber space to create ‘long-distance choreographies’ on the
computer screen while actually each dancer is situated at very different parts
of the world. Yet to understand
various creative and experimental tides arising within the dance fraternity,
not much documentation work has taken place to garner the energies of dancers
enlivening the open spaces of public contact like busy roads, market places,
metro rail platforms, or public lavatories, etc.
In the case of Akademi, while it does incorporate classical Kathak performed in
various open spaces, what it lacks is conceptual contextualization in the site
that is used. Their mode of performance seems to represent South Asian
classical dance cultures and bring them out in the open in cities like London , to an audience
with western sensibilities. While their works do harbor an immensely interesting
and spectacular quality[8], their
site-specific choreographies include multiple numbers of performers and make
enough use of technology like lighting and sound eventually to create an
illusory effect. Additionally, as stated earlier:
they play to a largely Western audience; most amongst them are not familiar with South Asian performance
traditions and the politics of representations and aesthetics that are
involved. Given such conditions, dance does not then become as socially
rigorous and intervening or questioning. The element of “challenge” which Astad
Deboo speaks of, gets decreased in and becomes ineffective.
One of the questions that arises is regarding
the how's and why's of dance. To address this question one shall be look
towards understanding the distinctions in perceiving dance, as a whole. As a
speculative answer to such questions, one can think back to the ‘Gutai
Manifesto’[9]
and the inception of Butoh Dance[10]
in the post WWII Japan. I believe that the very moment of inception of Butoh
dance in significant here for the discussion, and not the dance itself. The
point is that, dances emerge and various languages in dance undergo several
many changes as times pass. Butoh itself has now transformed into something
entirely different than how it was conceived to be, at the moment of its birth.
At this juncture, then, we need to understand the
role of dancer as a public intellectual. Theatre practice enriched by the likes
of Bertolt Brecht Eugenio Barba, Augusto Boal, Jerzy Grotowski has engaged
itself into a mode of social reflection and critique. Then again, even Dance
and Movements have in their very being, contained possibilities of change. The case of Pina Bausch[11]
is an able example. The radical changes she brought in dance theatre
(Tanztheater) were significant moments in German dance scenario. Yet some of
her pieces for example, Victor( 1986)
which was the first “residency piece”, as she called them and Nur Du (Only You) in 1996 along many
others which was performed when she travelled to Rome and Texas in US, respectively. Most of the
non-proscenium performances she worked on came when she was able to travel to
other parts of world.
Furthermore, this discussion brings us to one of the
indispensable concepts of the ‘flaneur’. As has been conceived not just Charles
Baudelaire[12]
but Walter Benjamin, in Return of the
Flaneur[13]
( 1929) the concept which he deeply analyzed in The Arcade Project (1965).
In this project Benjamin undertook clicking photographs of the arcades all
along Paris to form a huge compilation.
The Flaneuse, a lone female wanderer can also be a dancer. A
Flaneuse is what has been sought out here in this article but is she really to
be found? Where is her spatiality? If she is a wanderer and a dancer in the
city-scape, then can she be found and located, and identified? What and who
does she narrate of then? These are few questions then, I see not to be merely
discussed but practiced as an experiment in the laboratory of the city-scape
and its architecture.
[1] Astad Deboo, dancer/choreographer,
in conversation with Sunil Shanbag, co-founder of Arpana, a theatre
group, From Pg. 28, in
the book Beyond The Proscenium –
reimagining the space for performance , edited by Anmol Vellani,
[2] Take for example Chandralekha’s complete body of work, which dealt
with challenging many notions of traditional dance, essentially through the
medium of the dancing body. She did not shy away from taking note that essentially human body is erotic.
This she depicted by incorporating Yoga, Kalari, and Bharatnatyam.
[3] p1-9 Edited by Briginshaw,
published in 2001
[4] Refer to Deboo’s works like Five Minus Three, performed at the
National Gallery of Modern Art, Mumbai,
and also his performances Great Wall of China.
[5] http://movementparty.com/tag/site-specific/ (Accessed
on 5 March 2014 ) explorations of
movement across diverse landscapes and terrains— from ponds, beaches, parking
lots and public squares, to abandoned railroads.
http://www.youtube.com/user/AkademiSouthAsianDan, for classical dance in site-specific works
and videos
[7] http://www.postnatyam.net/about-2/(Accessed on 5 March 2014 )
[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KFJFymbe6M
(Accessed on 6 March 2014 )
[9] An art movement
spearheaded by Jiro Yoshihara in 1954, in the post WWII Japan . Jiro
wrote the manifesto for the Gutai art movement and it talked about the need for
human society to look deeply into the aesthetics of the dead and decaying. This
art movement involved many performance, installation and new media artists like
Wolf Vostell, Allen Kaprow of Happenings etc.
[10] a dance movement and a
performance style that emerged in post war Japan, foremost dancers were
Hijikata Tatsumi and Ohno Kazuo. the dancer of this dance form resembles to
unborn fetuses and in essence perform all that is de-generative in life n art.
[12] Charles
Baudelaire, "The Painter of Modern Life", (New York: Da
Capo Press, 1964)
[13] Walter Benjamin. Selected Writings II
1927-1934
No comments:
Post a Comment